My High Dividend Stocks Blog

My High Dividend Stocks
This is my high dividend stocks site where I help site members find high dividend stocks with earning power and strong balance sheets.

Some examples of high price to tangible book values.

Last Friday I wrote my “Tip of the Week” on book value and its calculation.  I used the original writing of legendary value investor Benjamin Graham in that article.  If you missed it, then you can get it here:

http://www.myhighdividendstocks.com/high-dividend-stocks/tip-of-the-week-book-value-or-equity-and-how-to-calculate-book-value-per-share

At the end of the article I calculated the tangible book value of Safe Bulkers (SB).  Today I will take a look at the tangible book value of a few more stocks: AT&T (T), Verizon (VZ), Terra Nitrogen (TNH), Goldcorp (GG), Southern Copper (SCCO), and Apple (AAPL).

AT&T (T) tangible book value

Shareholder equity equals $105.534 billion.  Subtract goodwill and intangibles from share holder equity to calculate tangible book value (aka net book value).  AT&T claimed $70.842 billion in goodwill assets as of 4Q2011 and $59.343 billion in intangibles.  AT&T’s tangible book value is negative $24.651 billion dollars.  The company has 5.93 billion shares outstanding.  AT&T’s tangible book value per share is negative $4.15 dollars.  That really stinks.  Maybe Verizon has a positive net book value per share.  AT&T stock sold for $30.64 recently.  Their price to tangible book value ratio is negative.

Verizon (VZ) tangible book value

Shareholder equity equals $35.97 billion.  Subtract goodwill and intangibles from share holder equity to calculate tangible book value (aka net book value).  Verizon claimed $23.357 billion in goodwill assets as of 4Q2011 and $79.128 billion in intangibles.  Verizon’s tangible book value is negative $66.515 billion dollars.  The company has 2.84 billion shares outstanding.  The tangible book value per share is negative $23.42 dollars.  That really stinks also.  Verizon stock sold for $37.46 recently.  Their price to tangible book value ratio is negative.

Terra Nitrogen (TNH) tangible book value

Shareholder equity equals $269.3 million.  Subtract goodwill and intangibles from share holder equity to calculate tangible book value (aka net book value).  Terra Nitrogen claimed no goodwill or intangibles as of 4Q2011.  Terra Nitrogen’s tangible book value is $269.3 million.  The company has 18.69 million shares.  The tangible book value per share is $14.41.  That is very low compared to the current stock price.  Terra Nitrogen stock sold for $262 per share recently.  Their price to tangible book value ratio is 18.18.  Shareholders that bought at $262 are paying $18.18 for each $1.00 in tangible assets.  That is a whopping premium on invested capital.  A smart businessman would never overpay so much for so little assets.  Stay away from Terra Nitrogen because there is much more risk than reward.

Goldcorp (GG) tangible book value

Shareholder equity equals $21.272 billion.  Subtract goodwill and intangibles from share holder equity to calculate tangible book value (aka net book value).  Goldcorp claimed no goodwill of $1.737 billion as of 4Q2011.  Goldcorps’s tangible book value is $19.535 billion.  The company has 810 million shares.  The tangible book value per share is $24.11.  Goldcorp stock sold for $41.04 per share recently.  Their price to tangible book value ratio is a respectable 1.7.  Goldcorp stock will be cheap when the price is near one times tangible book value.

Southern Copper (SCCO) tangible book value

Shareholder equity equals $4.015 billion.  Subtract goodwill and intangibles from share holder equity to calculate tangible book value (aka net book value).  Southern Copper claimed intangibles of $110 million as of 4Q2011.  Southern Copper’s tangible book value is $3.905 billion.  The company has 840.98 million shares.  The tangible book value per share is $4.64.  Southern Copper’s stock sold for $30.46 per share recently.  Their price to tangible book value ratio is an overpriced 6.56.  SCCO share holders who bought near $30.46 are paying $6.56 for each dollar of invested capital.

Apple (AAPL) tangible book value

Shareholder equity equals $76.615 billion.  Subtract goodwill and intangibles from share holder equity to calculate tangible book value (aka net book value).  Apple claimed $896 million in goodwill and $3.536 billion in intangible in their 4Q2011 financials.  Apple’s tangible book value is $72.183 billion.  The company has 932.37 million shares.  The tangible book value per share is $77.42.  Apple’s stock sold for $636.23 per share recently.  Their price to tangible book value ratio is grotesque 8.22.  AAPL share holder who bought near $636 are paying $8.22 for each dollar of invested capital.

Goldcorp is the only stock on this short list with a price to tangible book value under 2.0 and even that isn’t cheap.  I wrote this article to serve as a warning to value investors and high dividend stock investors.

Subscribe today for free at www.myhighdividendstocks.com/feed to discover high dividend stocks with earning power and strong balance sheets.

Be seeing you!

Sprinting to bankrupcy unless Sprint (S) can profit?

A friend of mine recently tweeted that he thought that Sprint Nextel (S) should be bought because he believes it hit the bottom three days ago at $2.39 per share.  I haven’t paid much attention to Sprint because it hasn’t paid a dividend since the end of 2007.  Sprint does not know how to earn profits; it only knows how to lose less than in previous years.  Their only hope is their pricing of plans and customer service because AT&T and Verizon both offer 4G & 4G LTE network services, and they both offer iPhone 4 and iPhone 4S smartphones on their networks.

Image002

Sprint Nextel (S)

Share price: $2.72

Shares: 2.996 billion

Market capitalization: $8.14 billion

Bonds: $18.5 billion

It amazes me that Sprint went from $1.35 in November 2008 to $6.45 May 2011.  There is a lot of speculating going on in this stock because the fundamentals are just plain horrible.

Image005

DIVIDEND RECORD

Sprint has not paid a dividend since the end of 2007.  It paid an annual dividend of $0.50 from 2001 to 2004, then it cut its dividend to $0.30 in 2005, and in 2006 – 2007 it cut the dividend to $0.10 annually.  Sprint offers no current income to its remaining shareholders.

EARNING POWER

                EPS                         Net inc.                Shares                  Adj EPS

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

2006       $0.45                     $1,327 M              2,972 M                $0.44

2007       ($10.27)                ($29,580 M)        2,898 M                ($9.89)

2008       ($0.98)                  ($2,796 M)          2,863 M                ($0.94)

2009       ($0.84)                  ($2,436 M)          2,886 M                ($0.81)

2010       ($1.16)                  ($3,465 M)          2,988 M                ($1.16)

2011E    ($0.93)*               ($2,786 M)          2,996 M                ($0.93)

*mean loss according to Wall Street estimates I looked up on Morningstar.com

Sprint would have to lose $0.40 per share in 4Q2011 to meet the mean Wall Street estimates.  I don’t think that will happen since the iPhone 4 users start adding to Sprint’s revenues in 4Q2011.  I think Wall Street analysts have set the bar so low than even Sprint can beat their estimates.

Results from the first three quarters of 2011:

1Q          ($0.15)                  ($439 M)              2,992 M                ($0.15)

2Q          ($0.28)                  ($847 M)              2,994 M                ($0.28)

3Q          ($0.10)                  ($301 M)              2,996 M                ($0.10)

----------------------------------------------------------------------------

Total      ($0.53)                  ($1,587 M)          2,996 M                ($0.53)

Six year average adjusted earnings per share is ($2.22).  I wouldn’t buy Sprint until it becomes profitable for several years.

BALANCE SHEET

Sprint’s balance sheet is frightening.  Assets are falling more than liabilities, so equity keeps disappearing.  It will be interesting to see

Image009

Book value per share: $4.35 as of 3Q2011

Price to book value: 0.625 (this is good, but book value keeps shrinking)

Current ratio: 1.12 (over 2.0 is good)

Quick ratio: 0.49 (over 1.0 is good)

CONCLUSION

Sprint offers no dividend, no profits, and shrinking shareholder equity.  These three facts do not add up to safety of principal and a satisfactory return.  The purchase of Sprint at $2.72 per share is speculative.  AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) offer high dividends, profits, and increasing shareholder equity.

Almost everyone who has bought Sprint stock in the past 12 years has lost large amounts of money.  This company has forgotten how to make money.  It will take a few profitable years and some hefty dividends to attract me to their stock.  Sprint offers no safety of principal with its horrible yearly losses and the bad economic backdrop.  What is their unique selling proposition?  As best I can tell it is the download speed of their 4G network.  They claim it is up to 10x faster than their 3G service.  AT&T and Verizon both make the same claims.  Perhaps they have the largest 4G network, but that doesn’t come across in their advertisements.  It will take huge infrastructure costs to build out their 4G network.  The large yellow circles mask the smallness of their 4G network.  I’m not impressed after visiting the Verizon and AT&T websites to examine their 4G offerings.  Sprint is sprinting to bankruptcy.

Image012

For example, there are many areas in Denver that you would only get good 4G service while outside on the street.  Most people are inside their work locations most of the day.

Image015

DISCLOSURE  I don’t own Sprint Nextel (S)

Subscribe today for free at www.myhighdividendstocks.com/feed to discover high dividend stocks with earning power and strong balance sheets.

Be seeing you!

TIP OF THE WEEK - Find Corporate Bond Info On Your Stocks Easier Than You Ever Imagined

Find Corporate Bond Info on Your Stocks Easier Than You Ever Imagined

Jason Brizic

Apr. 8, 2011

The high dividend stock investor must be aware of a company’s corporate bond exposure to understand its potential threat to earning power.  A surge in bond interest due can threaten the earnings available for dividends.

You can avoid a tragic investment mistake by examining a company’s bond exposure before you make a common stock purchase.  Two stocks with the same earning power can have different bond exposures.  It is not enough to know the overall long-term debt total.  You must go slightly deeper to gain an edge over the market’s other investors.

Morningstar has an excellent corporate bond analysis feature within its stock pages to help you quickly, graphically, and easily understand the magnitude and maturity of a company’s corporate bond issuances.  Many high dividend stocks are large well established companies like AT&T (T) and Verizon (VZ) have many outstanding bonds.

Click on the link below to go directly to Morningstar’s bond tab for AT&T to see what I’m talking about:

http://quicktake.morningstar.com/StockNet/bonds.aspx?Symbol=T&Country=USA

Here is the link to Verizon’s (VZ) bond tab:

http://quicktake.morningstar.com/StockNet/bonds.aspx?Symbol=VZ&Country=USA

These two telecom companies are similar in many respects.  They should be compared.  Their bonds might be the deciding factor when deciding on which common stock to add to your high dividend stock portfolio.  Note: I haven’t scrutinized their bonds yet.  I’m just providing and examples with lots of bond info.

For more tips, go here:

http://www.myhighdividendstocks.com/category/tip-of-the-week

Examples of Speculative and Investment Common Stocks You've Got to See.

The second edition of Security Analysis provided several examples of speculative and investment common stocks.  The examples are so illustrative, but they are from 1940.  I wanted to bring the text of this section of the book into this blog with examples from several of the stocks that I have blogged about on www.myhighdividendstocks.com .

I chose the following stocks for examples: Goldcorp (GG), Proctor & Gamble (PG), American Capital Agency Corp. (AGNC), Seadrill Limited (SDRL), Safe Bulkers (SB), and AT&T.  Let me tell you why I chose these stocks.  I wanted to also include Terra Nitrogen (TNH), but the results table would have been too unreadable.

Goldcorp (GG)  I used to own Goldcorp when it was priced in the high teens and twenties.  I wanted to revisit it because it is also in many gold mining stock funds such as FSAGX.  I currently own FSAGX in my 401(k) account and I’m considering selling it.  You will see why momentarily.

Proctor & Gamble (PG)  This stock is often written about in dividend aristocrat articles.  It pays a modest dividend and grows its dividend annually like clockwork.  Many people watch this dividend stock.

American Capital Agency Corp. (AGNC)  I’ve included it because I have written many articles on this ultra-high dividend stock.  I don’t like it because its earnings can’t support the current dividend payout.  It balance sheet is horrible like all financial institutions (e.g. banks).

Seadrill Limited (SDRL)  This stock turned up on one of my high dividend stock screens and warrants further investigation to determine if it is speculative or investment grade.

Safe Bulkers (SB)  I love this high dividend stock with earning power and a strong balance sheet.  You will see why in moments.

AT&T (T)  I pays almost a 6% dividend and it is and dividend aristocrat.  Many eyes are on this one so I want to know at what price is it a value buy.

* * * * * * *

Examples of Speculative and Investment Common Stocks.  Our definition of an investment basis for common-stock purchases is a variance with the Wall Street practice in respect to common stocks of high rating.  For such issues a price of considerably more than 20 times average earnings is held to be warranted, and furthermore these stocks are designated as “investment issues” regardless of the price at which they sell.  According to our view, the high prices paid for “the best common stocks” make these purchases essentially speculative, because they require future growth to justify them.  Hence common-stock investment operations, as we define them, will occupy a middle ground in the market, lying between low-price issues that are speculative because of doubtful quality and well-entrenched issues that are speculative, none the less, because of their high price.

* * * * * * *

Image001

There were three groups of examples in Security Analysis.  Group A were common stocks speculative in December 1938 because of their high price (figures were adjusted to reflect changes in capitalization).  The companies in group A were: General Electric, Coca Cola, and Johns-Manville.  Proctor & Gamble and AT&T sort of fit into the Group A category.

Group B were common stocks speculative in December 1938 because of their irregular record.  Group B in 1938 was comprised of the following companies: Goodyear Tire and Rubber, Simmons, and Youngstown Sheet and Tube.  American Capital Agency Corp., Seadrill Limited and Goldcorp are definitely Group B.  Goldcorp also has a poor divided and a high price.  AGNC is irregular with a high price.

Group C were common stocks meeting investment tests in December 1938 from the quantitative standpoint.  They included Adams-Millis, American Safety Razor, and J.J. Newberry.  I have never heard of any of these stocks.  The only stock in my example that makes this cut is Safe Bulkers.  This is why Safe Bulkers is in my best dividend stocks category.

* * * * * * *

Comments on the Various Groups.  The companies listed in Group A are representative of the so-called “first-grade” or “blue-chip” industrials, which were particularly favored in the great speculation of 1928-1929 and in the markets of ensuing years.  They are characterized by a strong financial position, by presumably excellent prospects and in most cases by relatively stable or growing earnings in the past.  The market price of the shares; however, was higher than would be justified by their average earnings.  In fact the profits of the best year in the 1929-1938 decade were less than 8% of the December 1938 market price.  It is also characteristic of such issues that they sell for enormous premiums above the actual capital invested.

            The companies analyzed in Group B are obviously speculative, because of great instability of their earning records.  They show varying relationships of market price to average earnings, maximum earnings, and asset values.

            The common stocks shown in Group C are examples of those which meet specific and quantitative tests of investment quality.  These tests include the following:

1.      The earnings have been reasonably stable, allowing for the tremendous fluctuations in business conditions during the ten-year period.

2.      The average earnings bear a satisfactory ratio to market price.

3.      The financial set-up is sufficiently conservative, and the working-capital position is strong.

Although we do not suggest that common stock bought for investment be required to show asset values equal to the price paid, it is non the less characteristic of Group C that, as a whole, they will not sell for a huge premium above the companies’ actual resources.

            Common-stock investment, as we envisage it, will confine itself to issues making exhibits of the kind illustrated by Group C.  But the actual purchase of any such issue must require also that the purchaser be satisfied in his own mind that the prospects of the enterprise are at least reasonably favorable.

* * * * * * *

Safe Bulkers is a dry bulk shipper with around sixteen ships rented out to various customers.  The dry bulk market suffering due to the global recession and a glut of ships built during the boom, but Safe Bulkers is well positioned to prosper in even that harsh environment.  Its prospects and the industries are good.

Subscribe today for free at www.myhighdividendstocks.com/feed to discover high dividend stocks with earning power and strong balance sheets.

Be seeing you!

Examples of Speculative and Investment Common Stocks You've Got to See.

The second edition of Security Analysis provided several examples of speculative and investment common stocks.  The examples are so illustrative, but they are from 1940.  I wanted to bring the text of this section of the book into this blog with examples from several of the stocks that I have blogged about on www.myhighdividendstocks.com .

I chose the following stocks for examples: Goldcorp (GG), Proctor & Gamble (PG), American Capital Agency Corp. (AGNC), Seadrill Limited (SDRL), Safe Bulkers (SB), and AT&T.  Let me tell you why I chose these stocks.  I wanted to also include Terra Nitrogen (TNH), but the results table would have been too unreadable.

Goldcorp (GG)  I used to own Goldcorp when it was priced in the high teens and twenties.  I wanted to revisit it because it is also in many gold mining stock funds such as FSAGX.  I currently own FSAGX in my 401(k) account and I’m considering selling it.  You will see why momentarily.

Proctor & Gamble (PG)  This stock is often written about in dividend aristocrat articles.  It pays a modest dividend and grows its dividend annually like clockwork.  Many people watch this dividend stock.

American Capital Agency Corp. (AGNC)  I’ve included it because I have written many articles on this ultra-high dividend stock.  I don’t like it because its earnings can’t support the current dividend payout.  It balance sheet is horrible like all financial institutions (e.g. banks).

Seadrill Limited (SDRL)  This stock turned up on one of my high dividend stock screens and warrants further investigation to determine if it is speculative or investment grade.

Safe Bulkers (SB)  I love this high dividend stock with earning power and a strong balance sheet.  You will see why in moments.

AT&T (T)  I pays almost a 6% dividend and it is and dividend aristocrat.  Many eyes are on this one so I want to know at what price is it a value buy.

* * * * * * *

Examples of Speculative and Investment Common Stocks.  Our definition of an investment basis for common-stock purchases is a variance with the Wall Street practice in respect to common stocks of high rating.  For such issues a price of considerably more than 20 times average earnings is held to be warranted, and furthermore these stocks are designated as “investment issues” regardless of the price at which they sell.  According to our view, the high prices paid for “the best common stocks” make these purchases essentially speculative, because they require future growth to justify them.  Hence common-stock investment operations, as we define them, will occupy a middle ground in the market, lying between low-price issues that are speculative because of doubtful quality and well-entrenched issues that are speculative, none the less, because of their high price.

* * * * * * *

There were three groups of examples in Security Analysis.  Group A were common stocks speculative in December 1938 because of their high price (figures were adjusted to reflect changes in capitalization).  The companies in group A were: General Electric, Coca Cola, and Johns-Manville.  Proctor & Gamble and AT&T sort of fit into the Group A category.

Group B were common stocks speculative in December 1938 because of their irregular record.  Group B in 1938 was comprised of the following companies: Goodyear Tire and Rubber, Simmons, and Youngstown Sheet and Tube.  American Capital Agency Corp., Seadrill Limited and Goldcorp are definitely Group B.  Goldcorp also has a poor divided and a high price.  AGNC is irregular with a high price.

Group C were common stocks meeting investment tests in December 1938 from the quantitative standpoint.  They included Adams-Millis, American Safety Razor, and J.J. Newberry.  I have never heard of any of these stocks.  The only stock in my example that makes this cut is Safe Bulkers.  This is why Safe Bulkers is in my best dividend stocks category.

Item

Goldcorp (GG)

Proctor & Gamble (PG)

American Capital Agency Corp. (AGNC)

Seadrill Limited (SDRL)

Safe Bulkers (SB)

AT&T (T)

Dividend Yield

0.84%

3.14%

19.50%

7.46%

6.85%

5.77%

Earnings per share

2001

?

?

-

-

-

?

2002

?

?

-

-

-

?

2003

?

?

-

-

-

?

2004

?

?

-

-

-

?

2005

$0.35

?

-

-

?

?

2006

$0.51

$3.05*

-

$0.56

$1.48

$1.24

2007

$0.58

$3.64*

-

$1.32

$3.18

$2.02

2008

$1.85

$4.25*

$0.28

($0.43)

$1.81

$2.18

2009

$0.30

$4.73*

$0.94

$3.31

$2.51

$2.05

2010

$1.64

$4.47*

$2.30

?

$1.66

$3.36

10-yr. average

?

?

-

-

-

?

5-yr. average (2006-2010)

$0.98

$4.03

3-yr. average

$1.17

4-yr. average

$1.19

$2.13

$2.17

12 times 5Y average earnings

$11.71

$48.36

$14.08

$14.28

$25.56

$26.04

20 times 5Y average earnings

$19.60

$80.60

A Mechanical Check for Investment in Common Stocks. The First in a Series.

In this blog post I’m going discuss some aspects of the mechanical tests your should apply to common stocks you are considering to buy and at what price.

On March 16th, 2011 I wrote about not buying a common stock generally above 20 times average earnings in this post: http://bit.ly/MaxAvgPE .  I have to admit that I was a little lazy.  Like most people I used 20 times the current annual earnings to complete the table in that blog post because it the info was readily available, but a five or ten year average is more through and enlightening.  It takes a while to find all the earnings data for the past ten years and then to make adjustments for changes in capitalization, warrants, and convertible preferred stocks.

The excerpt below from Benjamin Graham’s Security Analysis 2nd edition is a devastating indictment on how speculative so-called investors are both in 1940 and today.

Over the next couple of days I’m going to calculate many values for testing common stocks for investment basis that I’ve already written about on this blog.  The goal is separate the speculative stocks from the investment stocks.  The list includes: GoldCorp (GG), Proctor & Gamble (PG), American Capital Agency Corp. (AGNC), SeaDrill (SDRL), Safe Bulkers (SB), and AT&T (T).

* * * * * * *

Higher Prices May Prevail for Speculative Commitments.  The intent of this distinction must be clearly understood.  We do not imply that it is a mistake to pay more than 20 times average earnings for any common stock.  We do suggest that such a price would be speculative.  The purchase may easily turn out to be highly profitable, but in that case it will have proved a wise or fortunate speculation.  It is proper to remark, moreover, that very few people are consistently wise or fortunate in their speculative operations.  Hence we may submit, as a corollary of no small practical importance, that people who habitually purchase common stocks at more than about 20 times their average earnings are likely to lose considerable money in the long run.  This is the more probable because, in the absence of such a mechanical check, they are prone to succumb recurrently to the lure of bull markets, which always find some specious argument to justify paying extravagant prices for common stocks.

            Other Requisites for Common Stocks of Investment Grade and a Corollary Therefrom.  It should be pointed out that if 20 times average earnings is taken as the upper limit of price for an investment purchase, then ordinarily the price paid should be substantially less than this maximum.  This suggests that about 12 or 12.5 times earnings may be suitable for the typical case of a company with neutral prospects.  We must emphasize also that a reasonable ratio of market price to average earnings is not the only requisite for a common-stock investment.  It is a necessary but not sufficient condition.  The company must be satisfactory also in its financial set-up and management, and not unsatisfactory in its prospects.

            From this principle there follows another important corollary, viz.: An attractive common-stock investment is an attractive speculation.  This is true because, if a common stock can meet the demand of a conservative investor that he get full value for his money plus not unsatisfactory future prospects, then such an issue must also have a fair chance of appreciating in market value.

* * * * * * * *

Subscribe today for free at www.myhighdividendstocks.com/feed to discover high dividend stocks with earning power and strong balance sheets.

Be seeing you!